Monday, March 9, 2009

FDIC Takeovers



------

We need to break up and eliminate financial institutions that are "too big to fail." We need to take them over temporarily, break them up, and then sell off the assets that still have value to other players in the private sector.

No more bailouts. Instead we need what would be de facto bank nationalization. And just as with smaller banks, the heads of these large financial institutions need to be allowed to fail and to go home and announce that they are selling off their personal properties and downsizing their lifestyles. No more golden parachutes on the back of the taxpayers - and what's more, we should be going back in to collect on the bonuses and golden parachutes that have been paid out on the taxpayers' dime since last summer.

Get it done, Prez. The delay is costing us years in the recession trough.

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Douchebags on CNBC



------

I am really starting to feel that the economic crisis that we now face is in reality the failure of capitalism. Given the chance, your countrymen will rob from you until you are a dead withered husk. People may complain about the ills of socialism, but I must ask:

How can it be worse than the last 150 years of capitalism in the U.S.? Is it possible to have even more corruption than we now have? Will we face an even more ruthless oligarchy?

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Debt of the Dead

I hope when I die that people will say of me, "Boy, that guy sure owed me a lot of money!" - Jack Handey

------

So You’re Dead? That Won’t Stop the Debt Collector
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/04/business/04dead.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&hp

Dozens of specially trained agents work on the third floor of DCM Services here, calling up the dear departed’s next of kin and kindly asking if they want to settle the balance on a credit card or bank loan, or perhaps make that final utility bill or cellphone payment.

The people on the other end of the line often have no legal obligation to assume the debt of a spouse, sibling or parent.

------

That last sentence up there is all I want to publicize on the matter.

Thanks Stimulus!

Who Cares About Wall Street Numbers Anyway?

Obama On Stock Market: The 'Fits And Starts' Are A Normal Reaction
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/03/obama-on-stock-market-the_n_171489.html

President Barack Obama compared the stock market Tuesday to the daily tracking polls used during campaigns, saying that paying too close attention to how Wall Street "bobs up and down" could lead to bad long-term policy. "What I'm looking at is not the day-to-day gyrations of the stock market, but the long-term ability of the United States ... to regain its footing," Obama said after meeting in the Oval Office with visiting British Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

He said the developments he follows most closely are whether lending is flowing more freely, businesses are investing and the unemployed are going back to work.

------

Why the hell would the general public care what happens to Wall Street numbers on a daily basis? The market is so easily manipulated by pump and dump schemes and irrational bouts of both exuberance and pessimism that it's very hard to understand why the news media focuses on those numbers so much.

What is good for GM is not necessarily what is good for you and I. What is good for Wall Street is even less important to Main Street.

We are going to have to seek out a whole new set of indicators for what is happening in the economy. And we are going to have to find a set of numbers less easily manipulated than the current way the unemployment rate is tracked.

Legalizing Drugs

60 Minutes: Mexico's "Queen Of The Pacific"


The juice for everything discussed in that segment comes from the U.S.: the money and the guns. The problem is not so different from the gang problem we have within the U.S.: territorial disputes, graffiti wall markings, general gang culture hooliganism and drive-by gun violence all stem from the illicit drug trade. And the vast sums of money derived from the drug trade is such that the police and politicians in both countries can be corrupted.

The U.S. is awash in illicit drugs. The idea that drug prohibition is keeping drugs out of the hands of Americans is absurd. Anything you may desire is available for a price. Prohibition never curtails access, it merely creates a black market. The "Drug War" that the U.S. is still so famously waging is an admission that the drug traffickers are winning - that the drugs are readily available. "Just say no" is not a meaningful statement in a land without ready access to illicit drugs.

So what is the answer?

------

Everybody must get stoned
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/03/03/legalize_marijuana/

------

That article discusses only the legalization of marijuana but I could see things going much further. I mean, why stop there?

This isn't a call for society wide insobriety; it's about solving the very real crime problems confronting us on the streets each day. Prohibitions create black markets. Black markets create underground economies that thrive on violence, theft and prostitution. Gang cultures grow up around those economies and become problems of criminality for society as a whole.

What would the Mafia do without the drug trade? How about the Colombian, Peruvian, and Mexican drug cartels? How about the Crips and the Bloods?

Legalization and regulation are absolutely the cure for those problems.

When the money dries up and every drug becomes legal, regulated and taxed all the fun of being a bad guy goes away.

Why Pay Comic Artists? This Modern World