Showing posts with label Cost of War. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cost of War. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

News and Opinions Roundup

Here's a couple bits from Sirota:

Obama Admits We Can't Have Guns and Butter - Then Chooses Guns
http://www.openleft.com/diary/16357/obama-admits-we-cant-have-guns-and-butter-all-while-choosing-guns

During the Vietnam War, it became clear that America could not afford to simultaneously wage war on poverty and wage war in Vietnam. We could not have guns and butter at the same time...The same is true of the Afghanistan War, which will now cost at least $100 billion a year, thanks to President Obama's massive escalation. That's more than the same annual outlay for the universal health care bills being considered in Congress.

------

When Pundits Insist $141 Billion In Wall Street Handouts Is No Big Deal...
http://www.openleft.com/diary/16370/when-political-pundits-insist-141-billion-in-wall-street-handouts-is-no-big-deal

...it's a good sign of just how much the political goalposts in America have shifted, and just how completely the plutocratic ethos now dominate our "democracy." I bring this up in light of the White House now insisting that the Obama-backed Troubled Asset Relief Program will "only" cost taxpayers $141 billion. As you can see here and here for some examples, some professional political prognosticators insist this is awesome news - because hey, $141 billion isn't a big deal, right? And it's certainly not a big deal when the president is saying we barely have any resources for job creation, right?

------

Here's Joan Walsh from Salon.com:

Is the public option worth fighting for?
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2009/12/07/public_option_compromise

Influential liberals have begun arguing a funny kind of liberal Catch-22: The health insurance "public option" is already so diluted, it's no longer worth fighting for. Got it? Because liberal Dems got played by conservative Dems, they should forfeit the entire game.

Crazy as it sounds, it might also be true.

------

One more bit from Common Dreams:

Drill, Baby, Drill: Obama Administration OKs Oil Drilling in Arctic off Alaska
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/12/07-13

WASHINGTON -- The Interior Department today gave the go-ahead for Shell Oil to begin drilling three exploratory wells in the Chukchi Sea, a move that opens the door for production in a new region of the Arctic.

------

For me this last bit is the drop of the other shoe - that's Obama representing very nearly the same agenda as Bush Jr. for fuck's sake!

And Walsh doesn't go far enough. I don't think there is anything left worth fighting for in this so-called "healthcare reform" push. I say it's time to chuck the whole thing and for the Democrats to admit that they are:

  • corporatist whores
  • stooges for a not very well-hidden Wall Street plutocracy
  • not interested in accomplishing anything that creates either peace or financial stability for a vanishing middle-class
  • unrelentingly faithful to the two-party shell-game in which neither party contains the pea of actual political change


So, I guess what I am hearing from our leadership is the following short list of "fuck yous":

  • we can't have healthcare reform because it costs too much (even though real reform would save us a bundle)
  • we can't spend anything on job creation or greening the nation
  • we can't bail out families facing foreclosure, just the banks that put them into the streets
  • there's plenty of money for banks, investment firms and insurance companies that are too big to fail
  • there's plenty of money for waging wars of choice and even escalating them too
  • and fuck it, we are an oil obsessed nation of war-mongers! Reason alone dictates we must shit where we eat.


I'll give you one more bit from Chernynkaya commenting on HuffPo (the best stuff is often in the comments):

------

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/04/aetna-forcing-600000-plus_n_380130.html?page=21&show_comment_id=35693425#comment_35693425

How disgusted and pessimistic am I about our government? I talked to my young adult kids and told them to leave the US for somewhere in Europe while they are young enough to make a life there-- a life where corporations haven't destr0yed democracy, where government's role is to protect its citizens, where they can live without the fear of poverty if they should be so foolish as to get ill. So far though, they seem to want to stay.

------

So there you go, "American Idiocracy" in inaction!

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Broke and Still Spending Money We Ain't Got
on Wars We Don't Have to Fight!

This next stuff is really common knowledge but I have to document it anyway...

------

Money mess created by six years of Iraq
http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2009/03/money-mess-crea.html#more

It's primarily because we've spent or authorized more money on the Iraq war (its sixth anniversary is next Thursday) than we're putting into the stimulus program. Comparison:

•The Iraq war $864 billion.
•The stimulus program $787 billion.

Sure, greedy bankers, covetous Wall Streeters, irresponsible buyers of homes and cars they couldn't afford all contributed to this recession. But if we hadn't blown that huge bundle in Iraq, we could have handled our problems here at home more easily.

...

Many Democrats as well as nearly all Republicans in Congress gave Bush that blank check. Votes on the Iraq resolution:

• House of Representatives: Yes, 215 Republicans, 81 Democrats.
• Senate: Yes, 48 Republicans, 29 Democrats.

By contrast, the votes on President Obama's recovery or stimulus plan to clean up the mess that Congress helped create with the Iraq misadventure:

• House: 246 Democrats, 0 Republicans.
• Senate: 56 Democrats, 3 Republicans.

Both parties got us into this mess, but only one is trying to get us out of it.

------

It's simple really. Republicans think war is good for business and good for you too. But, of course, it isn't.

Maybe Obama, who very significantly rode in on the twin issues of the economy and the war in Iraq needs to rethink his position on Afghanistan. We don't need it. I know about the pipeline and the resource issue. But if we move quickly on greening energy usage we won't need any of that shit.

The world doesn't have to be this way.