Showing posts with label Krugman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Krugman. Show all posts
Monday, April 13, 2009
Krugman Calls Out GOP Hypocrisy
on Job Creation and Defense Cuts
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/04/12/krugman-defense/
In February, only three Republican senators broke party ranks to vote for the economic recovery package. Zero House Republicans voted for passage. Part of their opposition centered around the belief that an increase in government spending would do nothing to create jobs:
...
"Instead of focusing on three major issues — job creation, housing and compassion for Americans who have lost jobs through no fault of their own — to boost the economy, this bill has morphed into a bloated government giveaway." [Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), 2/10/09]
...
Chambliss, in particular, said that he was concerned people in his state would lose jobs if F-22 production was cut, because "when it comes to stimulating the economy, there’s no better way to do it than to spend it in the defense community."
...
KRUGMAN: What’s so wonderful is watching Republican congressmen saying, “But this will cost jobs!” The very same Republican congressmen who were denouncing the stimulus, saying government spending never creates jobs, but cutting defense spending costs jobs. It’s wonderful.
------
Amanda Terkel has more to say at the link, but that's the core of it.
The Grand Obstructionist Party could stop talking out of its ass any time now...
Monday, March 9, 2009
Krugman Nails It Again
I like Krugman's op-ed piece here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/opinion/09krugman.html?_r=2&partner=rss&emc=rss
Obama is doing things much too slowly. He's allowing the GOP to be obstructionists and thereby widening the chances of failure for his shallow policies. He needs to bold and make moves that run deep. Instead I see the same political manoeuvring that have made the last handful of decades economically disastrous for the U.S.
Force his hand, he apparently can't do it alone and never had the will to do so.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/opinion/09krugman.html?_r=2&partner=rss&emc=rss
Obama is doing things much too slowly. He's allowing the GOP to be obstructionists and thereby widening the chances of failure for his shallow policies. He needs to bold and make moves that run deep. Instead I see the same political manoeuvring that have made the last handful of decades economically disastrous for the U.S.
Force his hand, he apparently can't do it alone and never had the will to do so.
Monday, February 16, 2009
Less Than
Decade at Bernie’s
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/16/opinion/16krugman.html?_r=1&ref=opinion
Last week the Federal Reserve released the results of the latest Survey of Consumer Finances, a triennial report on the assets and liabilities of American households. The bottom line is that there has been basically no wealth creation at all since the turn of the millennium: the net worth of the average American household, adjusted for inflation, is lower now than it was in 2001.
------
Thank you Bush! Thank you GOP! All smoke and mirrors, all one big illusion.
I have said it endlessly for 8 years: these guys were a lootocracy. Reverse Robin Hood - steal from the poor and give to the rich. Whether through deregulation or war or crisis-based economics - they had both hands deep into your pockets. Believe it, you are living the proof of that statement.
Prosecution for the endless lies? Is it time?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/16/opinion/16krugman.html?_r=1&ref=opinion
Last week the Federal Reserve released the results of the latest Survey of Consumer Finances, a triennial report on the assets and liabilities of American households. The bottom line is that there has been basically no wealth creation at all since the turn of the millennium: the net worth of the average American household, adjusted for inflation, is lower now than it was in 2001.
------
Thank you Bush! Thank you GOP! All smoke and mirrors, all one big illusion.
I have said it endlessly for 8 years: these guys were a lootocracy. Reverse Robin Hood - steal from the poor and give to the rich. Whether through deregulation or war or crisis-based economics - they had both hands deep into your pockets. Believe it, you are living the proof of that statement.
Prosecution for the endless lies? Is it time?
Friday, January 30, 2009
Health Care Now
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/30/opinion/30krugman.html?_r=3
The whole world is in recession. But the United States is the only wealthy country in which the economic catastrophe will also be a health care catastrophe — in which millions of people will lose their health insurance along with their jobs, and therefore lose access to essential care.
------
...Very timely, very accurate, very right on target.
The whole world is in recession. But the United States is the only wealthy country in which the economic catastrophe will also be a health care catastrophe — in which millions of people will lose their health insurance along with their jobs, and therefore lose access to essential care.
------
...Very timely, very accurate, very right on target.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Paul Krugman's "Letter to the New President"
What Obama Must Do
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/25456948/what_obama_must_do/print
Excerpts:
How bad is the economic outlook? Worse than almost anyone imagined.
...
In other words, you have to get job creation right — which FDR never did.
...
Do the math: You probably have to spend $800 billion a year to achieve a full economic recovery. Anything less than $500 billion a year will be much too little to produce an economic turnaround.
...
The biggest, most important legacy you can leave to the nation will be to give us, finally, what every other advanced nation already has: guaranteed health care for all our citizens. The current crisis has given us an object lesson in the need for universal health care, in two ways. It has highlighted the vulnerability of Americans whose health insurance is tied to jobs that can so easily disappear. And it has made it clear that our current system is bad for business, too — the Big Three automakers wouldn't be in nearly as much trouble if they weren't trying to pay the medical bills of their former employees as well as their current workers. You have a mandate for change; the economic crisis has shown just how much the system needs change. So now is the time to pass legislation establishing a system that covers everyone.
...
...and we'll have universal health coverage up and running by the end of your first term. And that will be an achievement that, like FDR's creation of Social Security, will permanently change America for the better.
...
Universal health care, then, should be your biggest priority after rescuing the economy. Providing coverage for all Americans can be for your administration what Social Security was for the New Deal. But the New Deal achieved something else: It made America a middle-class society. Under FDR, America went through what labor historians call the Great Compression, a dramatic rise in wages for ordinary workers that greatly reduced income inequality. Before the Great Compression, America was a society of rich and poor; afterward it was a society in which most people, rightly, considered themselves middle class. It may be hard to match that achievement today, but you can, at least, move the country in the right direction.
...
I also haven't said anything about foreign policy. Your team is well aware of the need to wind down the war in Iraq — which is, by the way, costing about as much each year as the insurance subsidies we need to implement universal health care. You're also aware of the need to find the least bad solution for the mess in Afghanistan. And I don't even want to think about Pakistan — but you have to. Good luck.
There is, however, one area where I feel the need to break discipline. I'm an economist, but I'm also an American citizen — and like many citizens, I spent the past eight years watching in horror as the Bush administration betrayed the nation's ideals. And I don't believe we can put those terrible years behind us unless we have a full accounting of what really happened. I know that most of the inside-the-Beltway crowd is urging you to let bygones be bygones, just as they urged Bill Clinton to let the truth about scandals from the Reagan-Bush years, in particular the Iran-Contra affair, remain hidden. But we know how that turned out: The same people who abused power in the name of national security 20 years ago returned as part of the team that, under the second George Bush, did it all over again, on a much larger scale. It was an object lesson in the truth of George Santayana's dictum: Those who refuse to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
That's why this time we need a full accounting. Not a witch hunt, maybe not even prosecutions, but something like the Truth and Reconciliation Commission that helped South Africa come to terms with what happened under apartheid.
------
That's probably Krugman's most compelling piece of writing ever. Brilliant! He misses almost nothing. Although I would have made more explicit warnings about escalating things in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Krugman clearly doesn't want to distract too much from the main thrust of his extremely insightful comments on economic matters. Still, it remains true that if we have to watch where we spend our dollars we have to avoid throwing money away on adventuring abroad. War is the most foolish extravagance ever - and we simply cannot afford it! And what we don't waste on war can be spent on this country instead, within our own borders. You know, spending taxpayer dollars on taxpayers.
Onward...
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/25456948/what_obama_must_do/print
Excerpts:
How bad is the economic outlook? Worse than almost anyone imagined.
...
In other words, you have to get job creation right — which FDR never did.
...
Do the math: You probably have to spend $800 billion a year to achieve a full economic recovery. Anything less than $500 billion a year will be much too little to produce an economic turnaround.
...
The biggest, most important legacy you can leave to the nation will be to give us, finally, what every other advanced nation already has: guaranteed health care for all our citizens. The current crisis has given us an object lesson in the need for universal health care, in two ways. It has highlighted the vulnerability of Americans whose health insurance is tied to jobs that can so easily disappear. And it has made it clear that our current system is bad for business, too — the Big Three automakers wouldn't be in nearly as much trouble if they weren't trying to pay the medical bills of their former employees as well as their current workers. You have a mandate for change; the economic crisis has shown just how much the system needs change. So now is the time to pass legislation establishing a system that covers everyone.
...
...and we'll have universal health coverage up and running by the end of your first term. And that will be an achievement that, like FDR's creation of Social Security, will permanently change America for the better.
...
Universal health care, then, should be your biggest priority after rescuing the economy. Providing coverage for all Americans can be for your administration what Social Security was for the New Deal. But the New Deal achieved something else: It made America a middle-class society. Under FDR, America went through what labor historians call the Great Compression, a dramatic rise in wages for ordinary workers that greatly reduced income inequality. Before the Great Compression, America was a society of rich and poor; afterward it was a society in which most people, rightly, considered themselves middle class. It may be hard to match that achievement today, but you can, at least, move the country in the right direction.
...
I also haven't said anything about foreign policy. Your team is well aware of the need to wind down the war in Iraq — which is, by the way, costing about as much each year as the insurance subsidies we need to implement universal health care. You're also aware of the need to find the least bad solution for the mess in Afghanistan. And I don't even want to think about Pakistan — but you have to. Good luck.
There is, however, one area where I feel the need to break discipline. I'm an economist, but I'm also an American citizen — and like many citizens, I spent the past eight years watching in horror as the Bush administration betrayed the nation's ideals. And I don't believe we can put those terrible years behind us unless we have a full accounting of what really happened. I know that most of the inside-the-Beltway crowd is urging you to let bygones be bygones, just as they urged Bill Clinton to let the truth about scandals from the Reagan-Bush years, in particular the Iran-Contra affair, remain hidden. But we know how that turned out: The same people who abused power in the name of national security 20 years ago returned as part of the team that, under the second George Bush, did it all over again, on a much larger scale. It was an object lesson in the truth of George Santayana's dictum: Those who refuse to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
That's why this time we need a full accounting. Not a witch hunt, maybe not even prosecutions, but something like the Truth and Reconciliation Commission that helped South Africa come to terms with what happened under apartheid.
------
That's probably Krugman's most compelling piece of writing ever. Brilliant! He misses almost nothing. Although I would have made more explicit warnings about escalating things in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Krugman clearly doesn't want to distract too much from the main thrust of his extremely insightful comments on economic matters. Still, it remains true that if we have to watch where we spend our dollars we have to avoid throwing money away on adventuring abroad. War is the most foolish extravagance ever - and we simply cannot afford it! And what we don't waste on war can be spent on this country instead, within our own borders. You know, spending taxpayer dollars on taxpayers.
Onward...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
